How shared blame becomes a tool for avoiding accountability
At first glance, this phrase sounds mature.
Fair. Balanced. Even healing.
But often, “We were both wrong” isn’t reflection—it’s deflection.
It’s a way to dilute responsibility when the harm wasn’t mutual.
A way to avoid the discomfort of holding one-sided accountability.
Instead of facing the truth, one person reframes the entire dynamic as equal—not because it was, but because it’s easier to move on when no one has to carry the full weight of what they did.
What This Looks Like in Practice
- Equating someone’s boundary with your betrayal
- Rewriting abuse as a “conflict between equals”
- Forcing mutual apology when harm was clearly one-sided
- Saying “we were both emotional” to dismiss pain
- Using shared blame to avoid reflection, consequences, or repair
This behavior is rooted in The Entitlement Model and The Punishment Model. It reframes harm as justified or shared, so the person who caused it doesn’t have to change.
Where It Lives in The Color Gradient of Human Behavior
Mode | Pattern This Supports |
Defense Mode | Seeking safety by neutralizing emotional threat |
Manipulation Mode | Reframing power imbalance as mutual conflict |
Tyranny Mode | Erasing harm by rewriting history through forced equality |
How It Connects to Other Frameworks
- Map Level 1 – Emotional Gradient Framework
- Map Level 2 – Ego Persona Construct
- Map Level 3 – Our Three Inner Layers
- Map Level 4 – False Models of Society
- Entitlement Model: “I didn’t really do anything wrong.”
- Punishment Model: “They deserved it, so now we’re even.”
- Map Level 7 – How Tyrants Are Made
- Map Level 9 – Healing the Inner Child
This tactic emerges when Defense Mode evolves into Manipulation—especially through emotional language that protects the self but erases the other.
The Peacemaker Persona avoids rupture at all costs—even if it means rewriting reality to maintain connection.
The Protective Layer takes over with logic and fairness, while the Emotional Core—the one holding pain—is silenced.
Tyrants equalize harm to escape consequence. They weaponize emotional fairness to rewrite the past.
Many children were taught to share the blame, even when they were hurt.
They were told, “Take responsibility too,” just to keep the peace.
That child still needs to hear: “It wasn’t your fault.”
Emotional Consequence
When shared blame is forced, truth is distorted. Victims are made to carry what was never theirs. And those who caused the harm learn to escape accountability—with language that sounds fair.
But fairness without truth is emotional betrayal.
← Back ┃ Main Page Map Level 7 ┃ Next →
TEG-Blue™ is a place for people who care-about dignity, about repair, about building something better. It’s a map, an invitation, and a growing toolbox, as an evolving commons—supporting emotional clarity, systemic healing, and collective wisdom. Here, healing doesn’t require perfection—just honesty, responsibility, and support.