TEG-Blue·Interactive tools on .com →

Open Research

Transparent methods, credited sources, testable claims

Open Research

Transparent methods, credited sources, testable claims

ESTABLISHED RESEARCH

Established Research

41 research traditions across 24 domains underwrite specific parts of the TEG-Blue architecture. Each source is connected to its architectural function — what mechanism, condition, or pattern it makes visible — not used as symbolic authority.

TEG-Blue connects research by asking what each field helps make visible inside the same larger pattern. A finding from neuroscience may explain the mechanism; a finding from attachment research may explain the developmental imprint; a finding from trauma research may explain the chronic adaptation; a finding from sociology may explain how the same pattern becomes collective. Each source remains accurate to its own discipline, language, and evidence base. TEG-Blue places these findings in sequence — field → finding → function → position in the architecture. The contribution is the placement, not the individual pieces.

Why These Sources Connect

These research traditions developed independently, across separate disciplines. TEG-Blue proposes that they describe parts of the same underlying pattern: when the body cannot complete biological restoration, the nervous system organizes around substitutes — cognition, rules, hierarchies, bias, domination. Each source helps make one part of this sequence visible.

See the Regulation Thread →

Core Foundations

The essential science TEG-Blue builds on, drawn from multiple disciplines:

  • Nervous system statesSafety and threat shift what we can feel, think, and do (Polyvagal Theory, Porges)
  • Emotion as informationEmotions carry structured data about needs, boundaries, and danger (Affective Neuroscience, Panksepp; Appraisal Theory, Lazarus)
  • RegulationThe capacity to shift between states is more predictive than any single state (self-regulation research, Gross)
  • AttachmentEarly relational patterns shape how we seek safety across the lifespan (Bowlby, Ainsworth, Main)
  • Identity under threatThe self adapts, masks, and fragments under chronic stress (Winnicott, IFS, ego development)
  • Learning and developmentEmotional patterns are learned, reinforced, and can be changed (developmental psychology, neuroplasticity)
  • Culture and feedback loopsIndividual patterns scale into families, institutions, and social structures (Bronfenbrenner, systems theory)
  • RepairThe return to baseline is measurable and specific, not abstract (repair research, complexity markers)

How TEG-Blue Builds on Existing Models

TEG-Blue does not replace these models. It works like a translation layer that helps them speak to each other inside one shared map. Each card shows what the model contributes and what TEG-Blue translates or adds.

EVIDENCE MAP

41 Research Traditions

TEG-Blue integrates 145+ theoretical contributions from 41 research traditions organized into 24 research domain groupings and 41 tradition-level entries. Each entry represents a research tradition with its key researchers and cross-references to the frameworks that draw on it. This section exists for inspection — to show what the grounding is, how it was selected, and how to audit it.

How we selected these: The architecture was developed first — through independent research, observation, and cross-disciplinary reading. AI research tools were then used to systematically identify which established theories align with each framework. Each tradition entry lists its key researchers and which frameworks reference it. This is a working hypothesis, not a finished bibliography. We invite corrections.

41 research traditions

Affective Neuroscience

2

Attachment Theory

1

Behavioral Science

1

Clinical Psychology

4

Cognitive Science

2

Developmental Psychology

2

Emotion Science

1

Epigenetics

1

Evolutionary Psychology

1

Family Systems

1

Humanistic Psychology

1

Interpersonal Neurobiology

1

Moral Psychology

1

Motivational Science

1

Narrative Psychology

1

Neurodiversity Research

1

Object Relations

1

Polyvagal Theory

1

Psychoanalysis

2

Self Psychology

1

Social Psychology

7

Sociology

3

Stress Physiology

1

Trauma Research

3

How We Validate

How the mapping was built

The architecture was developed first — through independent research, observation, and cross-disciplinary reading. Once the structure was established, AI research tools (Claude, Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot) were used to systematically identify which established theories align with each framework. Full methodology →

The 24 research domains

The 145+ theoretical contributions are organized into 24 research domain groupings with 41 tradition-level entries. Each entry can be audited, corrected, or extended:

Affective NeuroscienceAttachment TheoryBehavioral ScienceClinical PsychologyCognitive ScienceDevelopmental PsychologyEmotion ScienceEpigeneticsEvolutionary PsychologyFamily SystemsHumanistic PsychologyInterpersonal NeurobiologyMoral PsychologyMotivational ScienceNarrative PsychologyNeurodiversity ResearchObject RelationsPolyvagal TheoryPsychoanalysisSelf PsychologySocial PsychologySociologyStress PhysiologyTrauma Research

What’s testable now vs. later

Testable now

  • Nervous system state detection in natural language
  • Complexity markers as regulatory capacity signals
  • Escalation / de-escalation patterns

Needs further work

  • Psychometric validation of emotional tools
  • Cross-cultural replication
  • Longitudinal studies

Plan for review

We are preparing for pre-registration of the core testable claims, with open data and open methodology. We explicitly invite independent replication, correction, and critique. Collaborate with us →

Anna Paretas-ArtachoFounder and creator of TEG-Blue, working independently from Barcelona. 25+ years of professional practice in systems thinking. TEG-Blue developed over two years as an integrative architecture synthesizing 145+ theoretical contributions from 41 research traditions across 24 scientific domains. Full background →