TEG-Blue·Interactive tools on .com →

Research Platform

Open science publishing for emotional regulation research

Measurement System

The Four-Mode Gradient

The observable, testable backbone of TEG-Blue. Four nervous system regulatory states that shape what we can perceive, feel, think, and do — detectable in natural language.

State determines capacity — what someone can perceive, feel, think, and do depends on where their nervous system lands, not on their character or intelligence.

01

The Four Regulatory States

These are not personality types or diagnostic categories. They are nervous system states — regulatory positions that shift in response to perceived threat, shaped by attachment history, social context, and current capacity.

Connection

Safety perceived

Empathy: Full
Flexibility: High

The nervous system perceives safety. Not forced calm or performed wellness — real safety that the body believes, not just the mind.

  • Empathy is fully online
  • Perspective-taking is possible
  • Flexibility is high
  • Repair is available
  • Curiosity about others' experience

Protection

Threat perceived

Empathy: Partial
Flexibility: Reduced

The nervous system detects potential threat. Walls go up, but they can come down. This is a normal, healthy response — everyone visits Protection mode.

  • Empathy is still available, but narrowed
  • Focus shifts to self-protection
  • Flexibility decreases
  • Withdrawal, quietness, guardedness
  • Recovery is possible with time and safety

Control

Safety sought through controlling others

Empathy: Strategic
Flexibility: Limited

Protection isn't enough — the nervous system decides that managing others is the only way to feel safe. This isn't necessarily conscious or malicious. It's a survival adaptation.

  • Empathy becomes strategic (predict/manage, not connect)
  • Others become objects to manage
  • Flexibility limited to what serves control
  • Accountability is performed, not genuine
  • Focus on managing perception

Domination

Power as only safety

Empathy: Offline
Flexibility: Minimal

Control becomes entrenched — power over others becomes the primary way of feeling safe. Empathy doesn't just narrow; it goes offline.

  • Others exist only in relation to one's needs
  • Vulnerability is weakness
  • Harm is rationalized or invisible
  • Truth is whatever maintains power
  • Repair is structurally impossible

02

Key Principles

Gradient, Not Categories

The modes exist on a continuum. People don't jump from one to another — they slide. The gradient nature is essential: someone in late Protection looks different from early Protection.

Health Is Mobility

A well-regulated nervous system moves fluidly through states. Getting stuck is the problem — not visiting Protection or even Control temporarily.

States, Not Traits

These are positions anyone can occupy, not fixed personality types. The same person can operate from Connection in one context and Control in another.

Biology, Not Morality

Moving toward Control or Domination under threat isn't a character flaw — it's how nervous systems respond to perceived danger. Understanding this changes everything.

03

The Core Testable Claim

The key variable that predicts relational and behavioral outcomes is not a person's current regulatory state, but their capacity to return to Connection when challenged.

Someone in Protection who can move back toward Connection when the threat passes is fundamentally different from someone who escalates toward Control. Current state matters less than trajectory.

This capacity is measurable through complexity markers — signs of self-awareness, perspective-taking, and emotional differentiation detectable in natural language.

04

Detection in Natural Language

The four modes produce distinct patterns in how people speak and write. A validation study analyzing 10,000+ natural conflict narratives identified reliable markers:

Polyvagal Markers

Physiological regulation signals: safety cues, withdrawal patterns, fight/flight language

Contempt Markers

Dismissiveness, superiority, disgust — signals of Control/Domination positioning

Moral Disengagement

Rationalization, diffusion of responsibility, dehumanization of others

Complexity Markers

Self-awareness, perspective-taking, emotional differentiation — predict return to Connection

Validation Finding

De-escalators (those who moved toward Connection when challenged) showed 78% higher rates of complexity markers than escalators. Mode classifications correlated with independent community moral judgments.

05

Layer 1 of Two

The Four-Mode Gradient is the measurement system — it tells you where someone is. It answers: "Where am I? Where are they?"

The 12 Frameworks are the explanatory architecture — they explain why the modes exist, how patterns scale from individual to systemic, and what makes change possible.

Layer 1

Four-Mode Gradient

Observable measurement. Empirically validated. Detectable in natural language.

Layer 2

12 Frameworks

Explanatory architecture. Integrates 139+ theories. Maps individual to systemic.

06

Applications

Clinical Assessment

Therapists and clinicians can use the gradient to assess client regulatory states and track movement over time.

Relational Intelligence

Individuals can recognize their own patterns and understand others' behavior as nervous system responses, not character.

Conflict Analysis

The framework provides language for understanding escalation and de-escalation dynamics in interpersonal and group conflict.

AI Safety

Structured gradients give AI systems vocabulary for patterns that binary safe/unsafe cannot capture.

Explore the Gradient

The Four-Mode Gradient is available as an interactive tool on teg-blue.com, with both Explorer (accessible) and Deep Diver (clinical) versions.

Interactive Tool →Validation Study12 Frameworks

TEG-Blue Research Consortium · Open Science · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0