Research Platform

Open science for emotional technology research

MODEL M1

Inner Compass & Four-Mode Gradient

The Instrument

How the nervous system orients between safety and threat, how emotions carry that orientation as signals, how four modes organise the response on a continuous gradient, and how the capacity to return determines whether the compass stays fluid or gets stuck. The foundational model of the TEG-Blue system.

Fluid Compass
Drag to explore
ConnectionProtectionControlDomination
Connection ModeBody-first
Pattern A·Indefinite — home base

The nervous system has enough safety to engage with complexity. Perception broadens, empathy comes fully online, repair becomes possible, and learning capacity opens.

The only mode designed for sustained living
SequenceEngage → Relate → Repair → Learn
Perception
Broad — sees the full field
Cognition
Flexible — holds complexity
Learning
Available
Relational
Full — repair, vulnerability, trust

Core Propositions

CORE PROPOSITIONS
  • Emotions are the nervous system's signalling language — the medium through which the body's continuous evaluation of safety and threat reaches the rest of the organism
  • The nervous system continuously evaluates one question: Is there enough safety to engage, or is protection needed?
  • The inner compass orients between safety and threat — health is not a position but the capacity of the needle to move
  • Four modes on a continuous gradient: two body-first (Connection, Protection), two cognition-first (Control, Domination)
  • What a person can perceive, think, feel, and do depends on their current gradient position
  • The same emotion produces different outcomes depending on mode position — assess the mode, not the emotion
  • Regulation is the return — the built-in mechanism by which the nervous system moves from threat back to safety
  • When the return is missing, the compass gets stuck — what should have been temporary becomes permanent, and identity forms around the mode
  • Two parallel information systems — emotional-somatic (fast, unconscious) and cognitive-logical (slower, conscious) — run simultaneously; understanding is cognitive, but the compass is somatic

Emotions as the Nervous System's Signalling Language

Emotions are not disruptions to clear thinking — they are the nervous system's signalling language. The medium through which the body's continuous evaluation of safety and threat reaches the rest of the organism. The body runs a distributed evaluation across the gut, heart, muscles, vagus nerve, amygdala — continuously, below conscious awareness. Emotions are how that evaluation gets delivered.

Fear is the signal that the evaluation found threat. Joy is the signal that it found safety and connection. Anger signals a boundary crossed. Each emotion carries specific information about what the evaluation detected — and each orients the organism toward a specific response.

This is the body's first language. It was running for millions of years before cognition evolved. When cognition arrived, it did not replace this language — it added a second one. The two systems — emotional signalling and cognitive reasoning — are separate but interdependent. Cognition can interpret emotional signals, override them, or replace them with its own narratives. But the emotional signals do not stop being generated. The body keeps talking whether cognition listens or not.

The clinical shift: from "emotion regulation" (emotions need controlling) to "signal interpretation" (emotions carry information that needs reading). The question is not "how do I manage this emotion?" but "what is this signal telling me?"
Research Traditions

Affective neuroscience: Panksepp (1998) — primary emotional systems as ancient biological processes; Damasio (1994) — somatic markers guide decision-making; LeDoux (1996) — threat detection before conscious processing. Polyvagal Theory: Porges (2011) — the vagus nerve as bidirectional communication pathway, neuroception as continuous safety evaluation. Emotion science: Frijda (1986) — emotions as action readiness, functional signals oriented toward environmental conditions.

TEG-Blue Contribution

Emotions reframed as the body's first language — cognition is the second. Signal interpretation replaces emotion regulation as the primary clinical frame. The framing as "language" carries specific implications: a language can be listened to or ignored, interpreted accurately or misread, spoken fluently or suppressed. When cognition overrides the emotional signal, it is not correcting an error — it is silencing one language and replacing it with another.

The Safety Orientation Question

The single question the nervous system continuously evaluates: "Is there enough safety to engage, or is protection needed?" Every emotional signal is an answer to this question. The question is the same across all contexts — personal, relational, systemic. The answers vary. The mechanism does not.

This evaluation is automatic, continuous, and below conscious awareness. Porges (2011) named this process neuroception — the nervous system's subconscious detection of safety and danger cues. It evaluates experienced safety, not objective danger. This is why a person can feel threatened in an objectively safe room, or feel safe in an objectively dangerous situation. The compass reads what the nervous system has learned to recognise as safe or threatening, which may not match current reality.

Am I reacting to what is actually happening, or to what my nervous system learned to expect?
Research Traditions

Polyvagal Theory: Porges (2011) — neuroception as continuous subconscious evaluation of safety and threat. Attachment Theory: Bowlby (1969) — the attachment system scans for safety and threat; Schore (2003) — right-brain regulation shaped by early relational experience.

TEG-Blue Contribution

A single question that generates all emotional diversity. Neuroceptive evaluation as the independent variable; compass position as the dependent variable. Every emotion — from empathy to defensiveness, from curiosity to withdrawal — is a variation on: safe enough, or not yet.

The Inner Compass — A Moving Needle

The nervous system's continuous orientation between safety and threat can be understood through the metaphor of a compass. A compass with a moving needle that orients between safety and threat. The needle is constantly moving — there is no "correct" position. It points in a direction.

A fluid compass moves between Connection and Protection as conditions change. It shifts toward Protection when threat appears and returns toward Connection when the threat passes. Fluid operation is not a state. It is the needle moving — responding, orienting, and coming back.

A stuck compass is one where the needle has lost its capacity to move. What should have been a temporary orientation becomes a chronic position. The person does not experience this as being stuck — they experience it as "just who I am." False coherence (F3) constructs identity around the locked position, making the stuckness invisible from the inside.

Health is not a state. Health is a capacity. Not where the needle is, but whether it can move.
Research Traditions

Polyvagal Theory: Dana (2018) — autonomic states as continuous orientation, polyvagal exercises for state awareness. Developmental neuroscience: Siegel (2012) — window of tolerance as range of fluid movement; integration as the capacity to move between states. Stress physiology: Sapolsky (2004) — stress response designed for acute activation, not chronic residence.

TEG-Blue Contribution

The reframe of health from a state to a capacity. Compass fluidity as a continuous variable — not "are you in Connection?" but "can your needle move?" The compass makes "stuck" versus "fluid" the primary diagnostic question rather than "which state is the person in."

The Four Modes

The compass has four modes on a continuous gradient. Two are body-first — automatic responses the nervous system has been running for millions of years. Two are cognition-first — deliberate responses that emerged when cognition evolved and the system gained range.

Mode
Type
Activation
Sequence
Design Duration
Connection
Body-first
Automatic — safety perceived
Engage, relate, repair, learn
Indefinite — home base
Protection
Body-first
Automatic — threat perceived
Fight/flight → freeze/fawn
Minutes to hours
Control
Cognition-first
Deliberate — cognition recruited
Anticipate → Manage → Override
Time-limited — tool
Domination
Cognition-first
Deliberate — cognition at maximum
Override → Eliminate → Secure
Rare — last resort

Connection

Connection is not relaxation or happiness. It is the mode in which the nervous system has enough safety to engage with complexity. A person in Connection can grieve, argue, problem-solve, and sit with discomfort — because the system has sufficient safety resources to hold these without treating them as threats. Perception broadens, empathy comes fully online, cognitive flexibility increases, repair becomes possible, and learning capacity opens. Connection is the system's home base — the only mode designed for sustained living.

Protection

Protection is an extraordinary emergency system. When threat is perceived, the entire system mobilises: attention narrows toward threat, emotions amplify, and the capacity to feel with others is filtered to survival-relevant data. Fight and flight are the primary responses — active, energised. When those are unavailable, freeze and fawn emerge as the body's fallback. Protection is not a flaw. It is intelligent design for genuine threat. The problem is when it becomes a permanent address — when what was designed for minutes to hours becomes a lifetime of vigilance.

Control

In a calibrated compass, Control is deliberate, time-limited, and returnable. The system registers that Protection is not enough — the situation requires structure, coordination, or strategic action under pressure. Cognition is recruited. The sequence is strategic: Anticipate, Manage, Override. When the situation resolves, cognition stands down. The compass moves back. Control was a tool. It was used. It was released.

Connection and Protection happen to you. Control and Domination are what cognition does when recruited into threat service.

Domination

Domination is the rarest mode. In a designed-operation compass, it is entered deliberately, used briefly, and followed by return. The person enters it knowing exactly what they are doing. Emotional Resonance drops to near-zero — and the person chose to let it drop because the situation demanded decisive, unambiguous action. The sequence is final: Override, Eliminate, Secure. When the situation resolves, the person exits. The compass moves back. Emotional Resonance returns. The person feels the cost — the weight of having suspended resonance. In a designed-operation compass, this cost is felt and processed.

Research Traditions

Polyvagal Theory: Porges (2011) — hierarchical autonomic responses, social engagement system. Evolutionary psychology: cognition evolved to solve survival problems the body alone could not. Trauma research: van der Kolk (2014) — the body keeps the score; Levine (1997) — trauma as incomplete threat response, somatic experiencing.

TEG-Blue Contribution

The four-mode gradient with two body-first and two cognition-first modes. The architectural break between body-first and cognition-first as a qualitative distinction — not just intensity but kind. Connection and Protection are biological responses running for millions of years. Control and Domination require cognition to exist. The presentation of designed-operation Control and Domination before their chronic versions — most clinical frameworks encounter these modes only as problems.

The Gradient

The four modes are not four boxes — they are positions on a continuous gradient. There are no hard boundaries. There are shifts, transitions, degrees. The compass needle moves along the gradient. A fluid compass has access to the full range. A stuck compass is locked at one position.

Transitions between modes follow a characteristic pattern. Connection to Protection is automatic — the nervous system shifts when threat is perceived. Protection to Control involves an architectural break — cognition is recruited into the response. This is the point where the system shifts from body-first to cognition-first. Control to Domination is the crossroads described in F7 — the threshold beyond which cognition is no longer managing threat but overriding the other person's reality entirely.

The gradient makes the proportionality question visible. The question is not "which box?" but "where on the gradient, and moving in which direction?" A brief shift into Protection during an argument is proportionate. A permanent residence in Control that began in childhood is not. The gradient makes both visible — and makes the difference between them measurable.

The question is not "which box?" but "where on the gradient, and moving in which direction?"
Research Traditions

Emotion science: Fredrickson (2001) — broaden-and-build as directional state, positivity ratio as continuous variable. Stress physiology: McEwen (2000) — allostatic load as cumulative measure of chronic activation.

TEG-Blue Contribution

The gradient as a continuous measure rather than categorical classification. Movement rate, range, and direction as primary variables — not "which state" but "how far, how fast, and can it come back." The gradient makes transitions, degrees, and proportionality visible in a way that categorical models cannot.

State Determines Capacity

What a person can perceive, think, feel, and do depends on their current gradient position. This is not metaphor — it is neurobiological reality. The current state literally shapes the capacities available.

Capacity
Connection
Protection
Control
Domination
Perception
Broad — sees the full field
Narrowed — threat-relevant signals
Strategic — what needs managing
Tunnel — obstacles and resources
Empathy
Full — RE, ER, SEA online
Filtered — resonance decreases
Redirected — RE serving strategy
Collapsed — ER offline; RE may be weaponised
Cognition
Flexible — holds complexity
Simplified — binary thinking
Strategic — planning, anticipation
Locked — rigid, self-confirming
Learning
Available
Reduced
Selective
Unavailable
Relational capacity
Full — repair, vulnerability, trust
Limited — vulnerability dangerous
Managed — relationships serve strategy
Absent — others are resources or threats
Restore safety first, then expect capacity. If a person cannot learn, cannot empathise, cannot think flexibly — the first question is not "what is wrong with this person?" The first question is: where is their compass?
Research Traditions

Broaden-and-build theory: Fredrickson (2001) — positive states broaden perception and build resources; threat states narrow both. Stress and cognition: Sapolsky (2004) — chronic stress impairs hippocampal function, learning, and flexible cognition. Developmental neuroscience: Siegel (2012) — state determines which neural circuits are available.

TEG-Blue Contribution

State-capacity correspondence tracked across all four modes as a clinically actionable framework. The table maps five dimensions of capacity across four gradient positions — making visible that what looks like "unwillingness" may be neurobiological unavailability. The intervention principle follows directly: restore safety first, then expect capacity.

Same Emotion, Two Expressions

In a fluid compass — where RE, ER, and SEA are all online — the same emotion produces different but proportionate responses across all four modes. The person is responding to real conditions, knows what they are doing, and can return. The emotion serves a different function at each gradient position, but it remains a signal, not a distortion.

RE + ER + SEA all online. Responding to real danger. Knows exactly what they're doing and why.

Connection
Protection
Control
Domination
Duration
Baseline — designed for sustained living
Minutes — activates fast, returns fast
Hours to days — when Protection isn't enough
Hours to days, rare — most extreme response, highest cost
Trigger logic
Safety present
Real threat activates the body automatically
Threat persists beyond minutes — cognitive override kicks in deliberately
Threat is extreme or unresolvable — maximum force chosen consciously
Guilt
Acknowledges impact, makes amends — Accountability
Recognises shame signal, holds it
Owns the harm, justifies nothing
Takes decisive corrective action
Fear
Reads real threat, stays alert and grounded
Mobilises proportionally, body leads
Consciously contains the danger
Eliminates the threat, knows the cost
Anger
Boundary signal — names and repairs
Activates defence, proportional and clear
Deploys anger strategically, no collateral damage
Overrides with force — chosen, deliberate
Shame
Vulnerability in service of repair
Holds self-blame without losing self
Owns the failure, doesn't perform it
Decisive course correction, no self-destruction
Sadness
Shared grief, genuine empathy
Withdraws to process, knows why
Uses sadness purposefully, returns
Allows grief briefly, acts through it
Envy
Turns envy into admiration and learning
Feels the gap, uses it as signal
Channels envy into strategic action
Eliminates the obstacle with full awareness
Joy
Play, celebration, full presence
Allows joy cautiously, real threat nearby
Uses joy deliberately, knows the context
Intense, decisive — earned and conscious
Love
Deepens real closeness and care
Protects the bond actively
Holds love while managing real danger
Protects at all costs — chosen sacrifice
Assess mode position, not the emotion. Anger in Connection and anger in Domination are the same signal producing entirely different outcomes.

Mode Lens — Social & Cultural Constructs

The same social constructs refract differently at each gradient position. In a fluid compass, the person knows what they are doing and why.

Connection
Protection
Control
Domination
Power
Shared, mutual agency feels safe
Feels dangerous — steps back or holds ground consciously
Used deliberately to contain real threat
Enforced fully aware of the cost — temporary and purposeful
Virtue / Obedience
Integrity means honesty + care
Complies where necessary to stay safe, knows they're doing it
Performs virtue strategically, aware it's a tool
Drops performance entirely — acts from raw necessity
Gender Roles
Expressive and fluid, emotions are human
Performs gender to navigate real danger, aware of the choice
Uses gender roles deliberately to manage the situation
Overrides gender norms entirely when survival demands it
Success
Sustainability, contribution, and joy
Survival mode — focuses only on what keeps them safe
Pursues achievement consciously to neutralise threat
Dominates to secure survival — knows this is temporary
Love
Freedom, clarity, and mutual growth
Protects the bond actively — pulls back to keep it safe
Controls access to love deliberately, aware of the risk
Holds love fiercely — protection justified by real danger
Goodness
Boundaries and compassion
Complies to avoid harm, knows the difference
Uses moral framing consciously as a tool
Suspends goodness temporarily — acts from necessity
Provider Role
Care, presence, and reciprocity
Provides out of obligation temporarily — knows why
Providing becomes leverage, used deliberately
Uses provision to secure safety — aware of the power dynamic
Silence / Confrontation
Silence means reflection, conflict brings repair
Silence feels safer — chooses it deliberately, not from fear
Silence is strategy — withholds truth to manage outcome
Silence becomes law — enforced consciously to end the threat
Emotion Expression
Signals, shared to connect
Hides emotions to stay safe — knows they're doing it
Uses emotions as tools deliberately, aware of the impact
Suppresses emotion fully — chosen, temporary, high cost
Belonging
Authenticity
Conforms where necessary — conscious and temporary
Uses belonging as currency deliberately
Enforces belonging — conscious use of exclusion to neutralise threat
Progress
Collective growth and learning together
Pushes forward to survive — focused, temporary
Pursues achievement to neutralise the threat consciously
Advances through domination — knows the cost, chooses it
Truth
Shared — we seek understanding and repair
Protects truth where necessary — aware of what they're withholding
Becomes selective — used deliberately to defend or persuade
Rewrites truth consciously to end the threat — temporary
Research Traditions

Affective neuroscience: Panksepp (1998) — primary emotional systems as functional biological processes, each with distinct action tendencies. Emotion science: Frijda (1986) — emotions as action readiness; the same emotion can serve different functions depending on context and state.

TEG-Blue Contribution

The eight-emotion four-mode mapping showing that mode position, not emotion type, determines outcome. This inverts standard clinical practice: instead of classifying the emotion (anger = problem, joy = goal), the model classifies the mode and reads the emotion within it. The same emotion serves completely different functions depending on gradient position — and in a fluid compass, all four expressions are proportionate.

Regulation — The Return

Regulation is the built-in mechanism by which the nervous system returns from threat to safety. It is not a skill imposed from outside — it is a process the system was built to run. The body was designed to mobilise for threat and then complete the cycle: the breath that accelerated must slow, the muscles that braced must release, the hormones that flooded must clear. The body does not reason its way back to Connection. It restores through the same somatic channels it departed through.

Regulation is closer to digestion than to exercise. You do not digest by trying harder. You digest because the system runs when it is not blocked. The body restores when conditions allow — when there is sufficient safety, when the activation is allowed to complete, when no one is interrupting the process with instructions to calm down.

Four Return Pathways

Pathway
How It Works
Breathing
Slow exhalation activates the vagal brake, signalling safety to the autonomic system
Grounding
Sensory contact with the present environment recalibrates the system from the threat that was to the reality that is
Co-regulation
Another person's regulated nervous system sends safety signals through tone, touch, rhythm, and presence — the most powerful pathway
Time
The body completing the activation cycle when given space to do so without interruption
When the return is missing, the compass gets stuck. What should have been temporary becomes permanent.
Research Traditions

Polyvagal Theory: Porges (2011) — ventral vagal system, co-regulation, vagal brake; Dana (2018) — polyvagal exercises. Somatic experiencing: Levine (1997) — trauma as incomplete threat response, the body completing the cycle. Interpersonal neurobiology: Siegel (2012) — integration, window of tolerance, relationship shapes brain architecture.

TEG-Blue Contribution

Regulation reframed as return, not control. The four return pathways as the nervous system's designed recovery channels — not techniques to be learned but processes to be allowed. The distinction separates regulation (the body completing its cycle) from cognitive management (cognition overriding the body's signals to produce apparent calm). What is commonly called "regulation" is often its opposite.

The Stuck Compass — When Modes Become Chronic

When the return is absent — when the activation cycle never completes, when the compass needle never comes back — the mode that was meant to be temporary becomes permanent. Identity forms around the mode. False coherence (F3) constructs a self-narrative that makes the stuckness feel like character rather than position. The person does not experience being stuck. They experience being themselves.

Chronic Connection

Permanent appeasement. The nervous system locked in the mode designed for safety — but without the capacity to activate Protection when needed. The person in chronic Connection cannot say no, cannot feel anger, cannot set a boundary — not because they lack the knowledge but because the system has learned that activating Protection is more dangerous than staying fused. Emotional Resonance is flooded — the person feels everything everyone around them feels — while Self-Emotional Awareness is gone — they have no access to their own signals. Reading Emotions is locked outward, compulsively scanning others. Chronic Connection looks like healthy Connection from the outside. This is part of what makes it the hardest chronic mode to identify.

Chronic Protection

Permanent vigilance. The nervous system that never received the signal that the threat has passed. Approach-avoidance cycling — wanting connection but reading it as dangerous. Energy consumed by threat-scanning. The body running on emergency fuel indefinitely. Hypervigilance is not anxiety as a personality trait — it is a compass stuck in Protection, doing exactly what it was designed to do, without end.

Chronic Control

Permanent management. Strategic warmth, managed closeness, performed empathy. The person looks functional — often more than functional. They appear organised, competent, relationally skilled. But closeness is managed rather than felt. Vulnerability is performed rather than experienced. Relationships serve strategy rather than connection. Chronic Control is the mode that most reliably mimics Connection, making the stuckness invisible — to others and often to the person themselves.

Chronic Domination

Permanent override. Empathy collapsed or weaponised — Emotional Resonance used to read others for advantage rather than for connection. Tolerance builds — what produced safety yesterday requires more force today. Escalation follows (F7). The person has lost the experience of the cost. In a fluid compass, the cost is felt. In chronic Domination, it has been absorbed into identity. The person does not feel the weight of what they are doing because the weight has become who they believe they are.

Mode is the default. Self-Emotional Awareness gone. Emotional distortion runs. Repair degrades.

Chronic Connection
Chronic Protection
Chronic Control
Chronic Domination
Duration
Permanent — the only mode the system knows
Permanent alert — alarm never switches off
Permanent override — cognitive control is identity
Permanent extreme — power is the only safety
Trigger logic
No trigger needed — appeasement runs regardless
No trigger needed — threat assumed before it arrives
No trigger needed — uncertainty itself is the threat
No trigger needed — any challenge activates elimination
Guilt
Chronic apology — always the self's fault
Guilt as permanent shield, never resolved
Guilt weaponised to manage others
Remorse structurally erased
Fear
Hypervigilant caretaking — fear of abandonment drives all
Permanent anxiety, safety never trusted
Fear of losing control drives all management
Fear of exposure drives power — invisible to self
Anger
Anger rerouted into guilt — forbidden, no outlet
Permanent reactive defence, no stand-down
Rage as management tool, framed as logic
Rage and contempt as default — punishment and coercion
Shame
Compulsive vulnerability — self-erasure as identity
Self-blame is permanent identity
Hidden permanently under superiority
Humiliation projected outward — others carry it
Sadness
Invisible pain — repairs others, never self
Permanently withdrawn, no reconnection
Guilt-tripping as relational default
Vulnerability weaponised — others' pain as leverage
Envy
Chronic self-diminishment — admires, never claims
Permanently less-than, no growth possible
Compulsive competition, zero-sum always
What is envied must be destroyed
Joy
Performed happiness — exhausting, empty
Joy inaccessible — calm feels dangerous
Flaunted for status, never genuine
Sadistic pleasure — others' suffering as the source
Love
Self-abandoning — love as complete merger
Clinging, terror of loss, can never trust
All love conditional and transactional
Love as ownership and control

Chronic Mode Lens — Social & Cultural Constructs

When the compass is stuck, social constructs stop being tools and become prisons. Self-Emotional Awareness gone. The person no longer knows they are doing it.

Chronic Connection
Chronic Protection
Chronic Control
Chronic Domination
Power
Feels dangerous — compulsively yields to others
Seeks safety through control or withdrawal — permanent
A tool to dominate or avoid vulnerability
Enforced — others' safety feels irrelevant
Virtue / Obedience
Integrity collapses into chronic compliance
Obedience feels necessary to avoid rejection — always
Virtue becomes performance, being "good" for approval
Virtue becomes performance, being "good" for dominance
Gender Roles
Performs gender compulsively to remain acceptable
Performs gender permanently to stay safe
Weaponises or idealises gender roles to gain control
Gender used to rank, suppress, or exploit
Success
Not failing others — self's needs invisible
Survival — fear of failure drives everything
Validation and superiority
Domination — others' failure ensures status
Love
Self-erasure — merger as the only safety
Protection — fear of loss or rejection dominates
Control — affection used to gain safety
Possession — control justified as care
Goodness
Compliance — guilt for saying no
Compliance — guilt for saying no
Moral superiority — others are shamed
Purity enforcement — fear as the tool
Provider Role
Compulsory self-sacrifice, no reciprocity
Permanent obligation or self-sacrifice
Proof of worth or leverage
Control — dependence used as power
Silence / Confrontation
Self-erasure — conflict is forbidden
Silence feels safer — conflict feels permanently dangerous
Strategy — truth is permanently withheld
Law — conflict becomes punishment
Emotion Expression
Hidden to keep others comfortable
Hidden permanently to stay safe
Tools — expressed only to manipulate outcomes
Weakness — suppression is mandatory
Belonging
Permanent conformity — authenticity lost
Conformity — any difference feels dangerous
Currency — inclusion and exclusion as manipulation
Submission — exclusion becomes control
Progress
Serving others' growth — self erased
Survival — permanently pushing to stay safe
Achievement for status and comparison — always
Domination — others' erasure ensures advancement
Truth
Suppressed to protect others from discomfort
Permanently risky — self-protection from consequences
Selective — permanently used to defend or persuade
Controlled — rewritten to maintain power
The person in chronic Control is not "a controlling person." They are a person whose compass has been stuck in Control — likely since childhood — because the return was never learned.
Research Traditions

Trauma research: van der Kolk (2014) — the body keeps the score; Herman (1992) — complex trauma and identity-level effects. Attachment theory: Bowlby (1969) — internal working models shaped by early experience; Main & Hesse (1990) — disorganised attachment. Schema therapy: Young, Klosko, & Weishaar (2003) — early maladaptive schemas as chronic patterns built from unmet needs.

TEG-Blue Contribution

Chronic modes visible as positions, not personalities. The person is not "a controlling person" — they are a person stuck in Control. The identity built around the mode is false coherence (F3), not character. This reframe shifts the clinical question from "what kind of person is this?" to "where is their compass stuck, and why can't the needle move?"

The Two Information Systems

Two parallel information systems run simultaneously at different speeds. They process different kinds of data, learn differently, and update at different rates. Both are always running. Neither can replace the other.

Emotional-Somatic System

Milliseconds. Unconscious. Experience-based. Slow to update. This is the system that runs the compass — the one that orients between safety and threat before conscious awareness begins. It learns from experience, not explanation. It updates through lived events, not insight. When someone understands cognitively that a situation is safe but their body still braces, this system is the reason. It has not received the update because the update it needs is experiential, not informational.

Cognitive-Logical System

Hundreds of milliseconds. Conscious. Explanation-based. Fast to update. This is the system that processes information, constructs narratives, plans, analyses. It can update instantly with new information. It can understand a concept in a single conversation. But it does not run the compass. Cognition can understand a pattern without being able to change it — because understanding is cognitive and the compass is somatic.

Understanding is cognitive. The compass is somatic. More cognition doesn't move a somatic compass. What moves the compass is experience.

This explains the insight-behaviour gap — the universal experience of understanding something clearly and being unable to act on it. The cognitive system has the information. The somatic system has not received it. They are running on different timescales, learning from different inputs. Cognitive insight moves the cognitive system. Only experience moves the somatic one.

The clinical implication is direct: interventions that target the cognitive system (psychoeducation, cognitive reframing, insight-based therapy) can change understanding but may not change the compass position. Interventions that target the emotional-somatic system (body-based therapy, co-regulation, corrective relational experience) are predicted to produce more compass movement — because they speak the language the compass actually runs on.

Research Traditions

Dual-process theory: Kahneman (2011) — System 1 (fast, automatic) and System 2 (slow, deliberate); Stanovich, Evans — dual-process frameworks in reasoning and decision-making. Somatic markers: Damasio (1994) — the body's signals guide decisions below conscious awareness.

TEG-Blue Contribution

The insight-behaviour gap as a testable prediction: cognitive interventions should produce less compass movement than somatic/relational interventions. Interventions matched to the emotional-somatic system are predicted to produce more compass movement than those matched to the cognitive-logical system. The framing explains why "knowing better" does not automatically produce "doing differently" — and makes the mechanism for that gap clinically actionable.

Relationship to Frameworks

M1 is the applied instrument. The frameworks provide the depth scientific architecture behind it. M1 draws most directly from these frameworks:

F1
The Emotional Gradient
Primary source. The full scientific foundation for the compass, the four modes, and biological restoration. M1 is the applied tool; F1 is the depth account.
F3
False Coherence
What maintains a stuck compass. How identity forms around the mode, making the stuckness invisible from the inside.
F7
Domination Regulates
Escalation across the gradient. How Control crosses into Domination, and how tolerance builds.
F12
The Two Information Systems
The underlying architecture. Why understanding doesn't change the compass. Why experience does.
M2
Three Awareness Capacities
Paired model — the calibration. What determines how well the compass works: the awareness capacities that develop (or don't) in the relational environment.

Where to Go Next

If you want to...Go here
Understand what determines how well the compass worksM2: Three Awareness Capacities →
See all twelve frameworks12 Frameworks Map →
Understand the foundational theory behind this modelF1: Emotions as Biological Information →
Understand what maintains a stuck compassF3: False Coherence →
Explore the interactive toolsteg-blue.com →
Collaborate on validating this modelCollaborate →

TEG-Blue Research Consortium · Open Science · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0